Archive | December, 2008

All New Stuff is HORRIBLE

31 Dec

Was at a holiday brunch at a friend’s house the other day. In addition to the grownups, there were two high school students and another kid who’s in sixth grade. We were all talking about music, when the eldest high schooler let loose this gem:

“All new stuff is HORRIBLE.”

He then went on a rant about bands that started out obscure and good and pure, and then betrayed him by going commercial and finding success. He then cataloged a half dozen bands (none of which I had heard of, all of which sounded like zones in World of Warcraft) and how their first two albums were great, but then all the kids at school liked the third album so now they are horrible . . . HORRIBLE.

“Do you think it’s possible,” I said, “that the band’s popularity affects how you hear their music?”

“Yeah,” he said. “So?”

It’s not like I was expecting him to roll over, but still . . . when you’re on the artist side of the relationship this kind of talk is heartbreaking. Maybe that third album was terrible. Or maybe after years of building an audience, Eversong Woods is rightfully enjoying some success. And yet they are losing a fan.

If popularity can lose you fans, it can also be a barrier to new ones. Later, the sixth grader said she wouldn’t read Diary of a Wimpy Kid (which, by the way, is f*cking delightful) because “everybody says you have to read it and that it’s so great and I bet that it’s good but I doubt it’s that great and I’m not going to read it and everybody says you have to read it.” This time I didn’t argue.

One lesson you could learn from this story is to be true to yourself. You might as well make exactly the kind of art you want to make, because you have no control over the irrational beliefs of strangers. (The obscurity/popularity continuum is one of many.) You could learn that lesson, but I would prefer that you not.

Instead, please consider this:

Part of your success may hinge on changing people’s beliefs. Sometimes the work does the changing for you (cartoons are for kids until The Simpsons comes along) but in other instances you may have to campaign. You may have to fight for your form, your genre, your aesthetic. Depending on the scope of your project (and the size of your ambition) this may mean something as simple as publishing a few articles that help pave the way for your point of view, or as grand as building an army of followers willing to level cultural villages on your behalf.

Happy New Year!

DCWYTBMA in First Quarter ’09

29 Dec

I hope you all enjoyed your holiday break. Santa (who does so exist) was very nice to my family. Even nicer was the opportunity to be away from the internet for a few days. I do love you so, internet, but sometimes it’s nice to take a break and see other technologies.

Now I’m back. Here’s what will be on my mind in the early part of 2009.

1. Teaching

I’m back at Carleton College teaching creative nonfiction this winter. Here is the course description:

Do you like it when true things happen? Would you like to take those true things and make them sound truer than true? Would you like to use words while doing that? In this course, students will write a rant, a reported essay, and also explore a creative non-fiction form of their choosing. Class time will be spent on live writing assignments, giving and receiving feedback, learning basic research techniques, and having discussions about things that seem trivial right up until the moment that their ultimate significance is revealed.

The course will be similar to the freshman seminar I taught in 2006, but with some nice upgrades. I’ll keep you posted on anything I learn.

2. Speaking

I’m giving a talk called “The Always-on Artist: Technology, Creativity and Making Meaning in the 21st Century” at the Minneapolis Central Library on Tuesday, January 20th. Here is the description:

If Shakespeare were alive today, would he be on YouTube? If so, would it diminish him as an artist, or prove his relevance? Author and journalist Dennis Cass will talk about the tension between the opportunities technology creates and the dangers of getting caught up in the “Next Big Thing,” and also offer tips for aspiring writers and artists on how to make a name for themselves in our crazy, mixed-up world. living arts The “Living Arts Series” is a program of The People’s University. Books available for purchase and signing. Seating is first come, first served. Doors open at 6:15 p.m.

I will be testing out material for the talk on this blog. You would do me a great honor by hitting me hard with any criticism you may have. I’m setting my expectations higher than usual this time and will appreciate any tough love you can love me with.

3. Blogging

Even though I was only gone for a week, the distance gave me a chance to give some serious thought to this blog. Here are some goals for 2009:

  • Teach myself iMovie and Photoshop
  • Sharpen and clarify the blog’s mission and/or better define the “awesome” in Dennis Cass Wants You To Be More Awesome
  • Get the posts on a regular schedule
  • Help 100 new people
  • Twitter?

Final thought:

I will always remember 2008 as the year I learned to stop worrying and love the internet. It hasn’t been easy, and I would have quit months ago were it not for good readers like you. Thank you for your attention, for your insightful comments, for your skepticism and for your honesty. For those of you who I have helped directly, I’m especially grateful that you would put your trust in a stranger to help you with your life’s passion. That takes a lot of guts. I hope you feel your courage was rewarded.

That’s all for now, my friends. Here is to 2009 being that breakthrough year.

2008 Year in Culture Thank You Note

22 Dec

Off the top of my head, in no particular order, and with some (but not total) regard for release dates, here is who I have to thank in 2008:

  1. Tina Fey for creating an imitation that’s more true than the original
  2. Simon Rich for telling animal jokes about human suffering
  3. James Wood for making How Fiction Works both practical and idealistic
  4. Wii Tennis for allowing me to play a sport I love, but with a giant cartoon head
  5. Deadspin for making sports gossip strangely fascinating
  6. Rhizome at the New Museum in New York for taking new media seriously, while also maintaining a sense of humor about its ridiculousness
  7. MGMT for writing a song that somehow manages to be hippie, meta and danceable all at the same time
  8. The Week for making the news easy to digest without making it dumb
  9. Virginia Heffernan for thinking deep thoughts about the intersection of television and the internet
  10. Nathan Bransford for fighting for better writing while never forgetting that people also like to watch The Hills
  11. Moonrat for giving the world an inside look at New York publishing, plus indie rock moments, plus the inspiration for people to go out and save books
  12. David Mitchell for writing Cloud Atlas and reviving my love of writing fiction

I know there’s more, but for now there’s not.

Next up: 2008 Year in DCWYTBMA Recap and Thank You

Cheers!

The Best and Worst of DCWYTBMA

18 Dec

Two weeks ago I wrote a post about the inherent laziness of year-end round-ups. Did I write that post from a position of highness? Or mightiness?

No.

I wrote that post fully anticipating that I would be writing this post, in which I invite you to comment on the highs and lows of DCWYTBMA in 2008. I have my own thoughts, but as this endeavor is mostly about you, I’m opening it up to you. (Why am I suddenly italicizing, like, everything? I do not know.)

For those of you who can’t be bothered, I present the Christmas Tree Cluster:

xmastreecluster

Writers As Rocks Stars & Dr No Words

17 Dec

Mini link dump for you today:

First, an interesting piece in the Columbia Journalism Review (for those of you who didn’t think CJR could bring it, guess again!) about how journalists might survive if they start acting like rock stars. These ideas apply more generally to other creative professions, and also dovetail nicely with recent posts about getting in by getting attention.

Second, behold the blog of digital artist Caleb Larsen. I love how he playfully mixes engineering, technology and narrative. The work looks cold at first, but then the warmth shines through. Nice. I highly recommend you at least sample Dr. No Words, where Larsen took the classic Bond film and edited out all of the dialogue.

Question: Can My Own Blog Get In My Own Way?

16 Dec

A reader writes:

I have always used my blog to gauge reactions to various experiments and writing styles, and I enjoy the immediate feedback inherent to self-publishing. But if I want to submit a story to a magazine, it’s likely that they’re going to want first publishing rights.

My blog isn’t particularly high traffic, so it seems silly that it would immediately disqualify a piece from more “real” publication: but apparently it does. (I’ve double-checked with a few publications, and even super small out-of-mom’s-basement kinds of publications take themselves so seriously.)

Am I missing something? Or is this just an awkward phase in the adolescent struggle between the virtual and tangible worlds? Do I prioritize a magazine who won’t get back to me for six months, tolerate simultaneous submissions, or even pay me *if* they publish my work — or do I damn The Man, throw the thing online and bask in immediate satisfaction?

I checked around with my editor friends and none of them seemed too concerned about assigning a story that had already been blogged about, as long as said blogging wasn’t exhaustive, well-trafficked or somehow seen as competition.

In other words, if you’re selling ads on your top-ranked parenting blog, then that post you wrote about getting your son to eat his veggies is probably not going to fly. If you have an anecdote on your personal blog about the same topic, then I doubt a magazine editor is going to hold that against you.

In fact, I was a little surprised by your question, because I would think that with 133 million blogs out there, finding a topic that hadn’t been blogged about would be almost impossible. The issue in the aforementioned (hack) example is not the blogging, but the eternal problem of finding a fresh approach to familiar material. (Perhaps Google Zeitgeist 2008 can help.)

Final thought:

If you’re using your blog to explore and experiment, please do limit yourself to exploring and experimenting. If your posts are too polished and put together, then that might be a turn-off to potential buyers. Even lazy editors want to leave their mark.

If I Were An Editor . . .

15 Dec

I’d give this kid a shot based on this video alone:

The medium is video, but he thinks like a writer.

Awesome Writing Prompt #3

12 Dec

giant-rabbit

Write a scene in which, despite appearances, it is the rabbit that controls the man.

A Tale of Two Agents

11 Dec

Agent A

Agent A goes into the office first thing and checks his e-mail. There are usually anywhere between 30 and 40 electronic queries from people the agent has never met. Nevertheless, he goes over them with great care, weighing the pros and cons of each one, and thinking deeply about their literary and commercial potential. This takes all morning.

Then, his assistant brings him the fruits of the regular mail. Agent A spends his lunch hour and most of the afternoon processing another 30 or 40 query letters with great care and much deliberation. At the end of day, there is just enough time to tweak the Submission Guidelines page on the agency’s website and to start drafting that all-important entry for next year’s Writer’s Market.

Agent B

Agent B starts her day having coffee with a police detective she recently saw on the local news. The detective is handling a high-profile case and comes off as articulate and charismatic on TV. There might be something there.

Then Agent B swings by a bookstore to see who’s on the front table displays and to chat up a bookseller she knows. The bookseller happens to mention a friend who has a great idea for a YA techno-thriller set in the pineapple industry. Intrigued, Agent B instructs the bookseller to have her friend query her and to make sure that he mentions the bookseller’s name in the letter.

Lunch is with the editor of a small, up-and-coming online journal that the agent discovered while surfing the Internet. It’s unclear what the editor and his stable of writers have to offer the world right now, but Agent B sees potential and extracts a promise that they keep her in mind as they continue to develop and grow.

Then Agent B stops by the office. She picks up the day’s query letters, which have already been sorted by her assistant. On top are the letters that are either requests or referrals. Then come the unsolicited queries that the assistant has deemed worthy of Agent B’s attention. Then come the unsolicited queries that the assistant has tagged as rejects. The agent takes the top layer to read at home later, then gives the second layer a single read and pulls a couple of queries that show promise. (She’ll read them along with the top layer.) Agent B then skims the last layer just to make sure her assistant is doing her job. On some days, she ignores that last layer altogether.

Finally, a quick staff meeting where Agent B and her assistant and their intern talk about the manuscripts and partials that are currently on submission. Meeting quickly devolves into a more general discussion about what is going on in the culture, what bores them, what excites them, etc. Toward the end of the meeting, Agent B’s assistant reminds her that the deadline for the Writer’s Market entry is at the end of the week. Agent B tells the intern to write something up and have the assistant review it before passing it along to her for final approval. “Just make sure you say we don’t handle romance novels,” says Agent B. “It won’t stop people, but what can you do?”

Questions:

Which agent is more successful?

Which agent would you rather represent you?

Which agent is more likely to exist outside of yet another ham-fisted parable written by Dennis Cass?

There’s A Fine Line between Offensive And Clever

10 Dec

First, a very dead Fred Astaire flogs Dirt Devil vaccums. (Couldn’t find the video. We’ll have to settle for this disturbing still.)

ap_astaire_080130_ssh2

Then John Wayne comes back from the grave to appear in this crepuscular Coors Light ad:

Not surprisingly, fans and critics protest the digital pimping of iconic stars. It almost becomes a rule: Don’t f*cking pull sh*t like this.

Then this Nokia ad comes along:

I have thoughts on why this works, but first I’ll throw it out to the community. What’s your take?

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.